grahamGrafx

marco:

… all tr.im links will continue to redirect, and will do so until at least December 31, 2009. Your tweets with tr.im URLs in them will not be affected.

We regret that it came to this, but all of our efforts to avoid it failed. No business we approached wanted to purchase tr.im for even a minor amount. There is no way for us to monetize URL shortening — users won’t pay for it — and we just can’t justify further devleopment since Twitter has all but annointed bit.ly the market winner. There is simply no point for us to continue operating tr.im, and pay for its upkeep.

There are two stories here: how sad it is that this type of tool, despite being extraordinarily cheap and easy to operate, isn’t worth running for one of its most successful players, and the inherent danger that this shows in relying on shortened URLs for anything other than temporary, disposable use.

This will reorganize a little bit of the internet. Image there are some one way roads in your city, not commonly traveled, but they are there and some people use them. Then all of a sudden a whole bunch of road close down abruptly. Some people saw it coming and switched their travel routes, some didn’t. Traffic is reorganized blocking some short cuts people use. It’s a small change, but certainly a change to the layout of the city. In the topography the web some places became a little farther to reach or invisible to search bots.
  1. dentarg reblogged this from marco
  2. beingrandom reblogged this from marco
  3. nevali reblogged this from marco and added:
    That’s aligned pretty much exactly with my own thoughts.
  4. tweetstream reblogged this from whitneymcn and added:
    In “my model”… URL-shortening services evolve into URL-eliminating services in conjunction with Twitter interface...
  5. grahamgrafx reblogged this from marco and added:
    This will reorganize a little bit of the internet. Image there are some one way roads in your city, not commonly...
  6. tsparks reblogged this from marco
  7. mikemccarron reblogged this from marco and added:
    unfortunate turn...events. I recently switched to bit.ly but never lost any love
  8. codeit reblogged this from marco and added:
    My first thought is that Tumblr, with it’s investment into Twitter integration, might look at an acquisition: “Trimblr”....
  9. whitneymcn reblogged this from marco and added:
    Third story: “we just can’t justify further development since Twitter has all but annointed bit.ly the market winner.”...
  10. rafer reblogged this from marco and added:
    Rafer sez: Anyone know the tr.im people? Let’s use this situation to start fixing the problems with the URL shortener...
  11. morrowplanet reblogged this from marco
  12. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from marco
  13. stuffparty reblogged this from marco and added:
    Bugger. That leaves the question of which service to use instead of tr.im. Also, dear Tumblr, could you make this a...
  14. marco posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus