Here Tumblr. I found this on digg.
You love this sort of shit.

j/k. I love you. lol.

I made this 3D animation in 2006 when I learned Cinema 4d. The project was born from the idea that everyone’s desktop and computer is their home. It lacks any real story arch and the animations are a little too whimsical for me to be proud of, but I can still get behind the concept. Everyone’s computer is their home and we venture out into the big city of the internet. I still feel this way, and the explosion of social media in the last 4 years has only further solidified the metaphor to me.
What we post online is like the outside of our home, and our desktop and PC is the furniture and decor we rearrange for our personal comfort. we choose the music, curtains, and work on our own projects. Whenever someone sees my screen in a screen cast or over my should I feel like they’re visiting my house. Oh what a mess my desktop is. How embarrassing.

Do you feel like your computer will be your Second-Life/Matrix home?

When I first thought of what to focus on for my second year of grad school, my thesis, I knew I wanted to visually represent my curiosity and personal vision of how virtual social networks has affected my personal relationships. I wanted to “paint” my Facebook friends as a painter would paint love or pain.
I spent a lot time imagining a metaphor that adequately represented my own unique perspective on the subject. Remember that individual perspective and not data visualization was the goal. I chose the lightning bug to be my metaphor because of my fundamental emotional response I’ve always felt in their presence. The more I thought about the metaphor the more I was satisfied.
Once I started studying social media, synchronicity, and emergence I discovered that lightning bugs were a common theme. Mathematician, Steven Strogatz studied them for their oscillators. Lightning bugs were perfect for my “digital painting.” They had personal meaning, they were beautiful, they synchronized, they communicated over distance, they grew strength in numbers, there were studies that matched my own interest, and they all possessed unique features while still being able to find common traits.



So what I find interesting today, and what spurred this blog post is the chance that I stumbled upon the perfect metaphor. I feel that this is a case of art finding truth be reverse engineering the human mind.
How did I choose it? What lead me to lightening bugs without any prior knowledge of Strogatz’s studies or any knowledge of their biological makeup? Was I just lucky? Is there a reasonable mental connection for why I thought of lightning bugs? Did I hear the comparison before and forgotten it?

-Digital Painting: Social Media

Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s Levels of Nothingness at the Guggenheim, Summary

I really enjoyed the light show it. There were a seres of quotes from artists and authors such as Kadinsky regarding the perception of color. There was a circle of colored micro-controlled stage light’s that reacted to Isabella Rossellini’s reading of the quotes. They responded it different ways depending on the topic such as changing color, speeding up, slowing down, or moving in different directions. There was a spot light on Isabella that changed color on the topic as well. After her monolog Rapheal hosted as the audience read quotes. The user would chose a topic and a random quote would appear. The lights would react as the did to Isabella. I don’t think this was intended as part of the art work, but as the lights lifted there was a fixed camera on the seats. It read the color and the out put was a matrix of the read color. The camera would read the color and the corresponding pixel, the out put was a rectangle with the name of the “commercial color.” Color names such as those that appear on crayons and paint buckets in Home Depot (ie: apple red, sand, sky blue, ext). My interpretation is that the work is about the an individuals perception of color and how it relates to their understanding of reality.

It was boring :) I found the quotes provocative but i think i would’ve benefitted more from it being a more personal experience then hearing Isabelle read them. She was great, but I don’t feel like a professional actress was necessary. I felt a like too disconnected to what was intended to be interactive. I felt like I was watching an adult episode of sesame street about color feature Isabelle Rossellini. I think Rapheal preferred it to be entirely interactive just as his previous work such as Pulse Park.

Here is a video. I apologize for the quality(iPhone), but I’m sure video wasn’t allowed. I didn’t bother to find out if I couldn’t. Yes, I was that guy.

Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s Levels of Nothingness at the Guggenheim

mixedtapes:

midnight meeting